King Shree Ram

http://blogs.timesofindia.com/jugglebandhi/entry/is-ram-really-for-real

Mr. Jug Suraiya, I donot agree with your view that Ram is Not Real, AS, YOU ARE NOT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL AUTHORITY TO SPEAK WITH CONFIDENCE THAT RAM NEVER EXISTED.

Shree Ram is accepted as Ancient Ruler of India by all countries from Persia to Japan through there historical records of ancient times. His capable administration still a part for folklore in Shri-Lanka, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar, Korea, Japan, China, besides the Indian sub-continent that he ruled. And he still continues to rule billions of hearts of Hindus as obedient son, a good brother and a great ruler.

Predominantly Buddhists countries refer to Shree Ram as Bodhisattva King. Which is Right as we ourselves refer Gautam Buddha as Vishnu avatar. If writings of script are no historical proofs of existence then there are not mortal remains of existence of Muhammad and Jesus too.

Its a fact that Shree Ram has less physical evidence of existence as his era happened to be earlier than Shree Krishna (4000 - 5000 yrs BC), Gautam Buddha (400 BC) and (16th Century) Chhatrapati Shivaji.

Since Hindu philosophy, believes in seeking God within oneself. Idolizing those who sought the divine power in themselves and were successful in using the divine power for social benefit should not be a surprise. We pray Saints like Tukaram, Chokha mahar, Gora Kumbhar, as much as we pray the God Vitthal-Rukhmini.

Its another debate whether Shree Ram was Shree Vishnu's (God's) Avatar (incarnation) or not, but proof of existence
King, Samrat, Shree Ram OR Sultan Ram ( as Malaysians & Indonesians refer to him) is certainly present in abundance throughout the historical records of all Asian Countries. So, Shree Ram is as real as we all are.

As far as the Setu Samudram project is concerned, its feasibility itself is a questionable, leave aside profitability. you will find enough evidence of it on net.

And no country not even USA or UK will ever sacrifice its heritage site for new project As they are essential links to human as well as cultural evolution in the country. why expect Indians to part with it ??